The Global City And Climate Change: Their Final Solution

In the wake of their meltdown after their defeat at the COP26 Summit, the British Empire escalated their strategic provocations against those nations that defeated the monarchy’s plans for a global green dictatorship. Militarily, Russia was targeted by escalations in Ukraine, and later in Kazakhstan, while China was targeted by continued provocations in Taiwan. As these strategic provocations continue to unfold, British-led forces are also threatening financial warfare in the form of sanctions against China over Xinjiang Province and Russia over Ukraine, adding threats to expel Russia from the SWIFT network, cutting off Russia’s access to international finance.

City of London: a very wicked place.

The main reason Russia and China are targeted by financial warfare, is that they are creating a new, emerging paradigm of peaceful economic development, centered on the Belt and Road Initiative—a policy that significantly overlaps the World Land-Bridge proposal that Lyndon LaRouche and his wife Helga Zepp-LaRouche have promoted since the 1990’s.
Military provocations targeting Russia and China must be seen in the context of Prince Charles’s call in Glasgow for “a vast military-style campaign to marshal the strength of the global private sector” to achieve his desired green “fundamental economic transition.” The green agenda posed by Charles at COP26 is the British Empire’s “final solution”—global depopulation of billions. The green program is at the center of the “Global Britain’’ strategic policy of her majesty’s government, but it is also at the center of “The Global City” financial warfare initiative of The City of London Corporation. (Within London, but not controlled by it, lies the City of London, a city-within-a-city. This “Square Mile” is governed not by the Mayor of London, but by the Lord Mayor of London, who is elected by the City of London Corporation, established in 1191.) The City of London intends to be the center of green finance, and the center of the dictatorship run through the central banks—with the Bank of England playing the commanding role in that global dictatorship. The British monarchy and the City of London Corporation have always been the hard core of the British Empire, but, as Lyndon LaRouche has described, their empire is a “slime mold,” with junior partners in other monarchies and corrupt financiers operating in Wall Street and other centers of usury, including offshore banking centers.
The British know that their continued existence depends on their plan for a green dictatorship. They laid out the blueprint for that plan at the 2019 Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, calling it a “regime change” where central banks would direct government spending towards the green depopulation agenda, and hyperinflate away their unpayable debt of their bankrupt system. They intend to run this regime change through their control of digital currency and by preventing investment into carbon or nuclear based energy. And even as their failure in Glasgow was unfolding, the British Empire signaled its absolute commitment to this green final solution.

Regime Change To Shift The Trillions

As Prince Charles threatened the world with his plans for a global fascist Malthusian dictatorship in Glasgow, he would have known by then, or likely weeks or months before then, that COP26 had already failed. It was known that Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin would not attend in person. It was probably known as well that India would not commit to the COP26 decarbonization agenda, even before Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave his speech there to that effect. At the same time, domestic efforts to secure the green agenda of Biden’s “Build Back Better” were foundering in the US Senate, with Senator Manchin (D-West Virginia) playing a crucial role in blocking it so far, on top of a growing rejection by state governments in the US of the “30x30” scheme to take 30% of land and water out of productive use by 2030.
Prince Charles’s top henchmen, former Governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney and Sir Michael Bloomberg, would have also known that COP26 was a bust. Yet, in the middle of the failed conference, they issued their November 3 op-ed, published in Bloomberg News, “To Fight Climate Change, Put Markets to Work,” to stridently claim that they have corralled the world’s largest financial zombies who represent “more than 450 major financial institutions across 45 countries, controlling assets of more than $130 trillion,” to join their Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ).
However, without governments, the Carney and Bloomberg bluster about commitments from Prince Charles’s “global private sector,” mean nothing. Leading City of London mouthpiece, The Economist, acknowledged that in a November 4 piece, arguing that while GFANZ’s pledges are good as far as they go, “the world needs a widespread price on carbon if finance is to be transformational. That would target all firms, not just those controlled by some institutional investors.” Similarly, the Financial Times put out a November 3 op-ed on its Lex financial commentary service column, “COP26: Carney’s $130tn Climate Pledge Is Too Big To Be Credible,” again arguing that without government enforcement and coffers backed up by their pound of flesh, the green agenda was a chimera.
But of course, Charles and his henchmen do intend to have governments in their global green dictatorship— and they intend to do this by “regime change.” Representatives of the behemoth asset management firm, BlackRock, laid out the blueprint for this agenda to the August 2019 annual gathering of global central bankers at Jackson Hole, WY, in a paper titled “Dealing with the next downturn: From unconventional monetary policy to unprecedented policy coordination.” In an interview discussing their proposal, former head of the Swiss central bank and vice-chair of BlackRock, Philipp Hildebrand, stated,

“…we’re going to see a regime change in monetary policy that’s as big a deal as the one we saw between pre-crisis and post crisis [the introduction of central bank-unleashed quantitative easing in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis-ed.]. And one element of this, an important one, will be a blurring of fiscal and monetary activities and responsibilities.”

This “blurring of fiscal and monetary activities and responsibilities” refers to the traditional role of central banks as responsible for monetary policies like setting interest rates, etc., but not being responsible for spending policies—i.e. the direction of credit— which are decisions normally made by elected representatives of government that should be a government “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Putting the central banks in control of extending credit is essential for this planned green dictatorship and would override the responsibility of governments to act on behalf of the general welfare. While the creation and control of credit is essential for dictatorship, it is also essential to print the money required to hyperinflate away the debt of the City of London and Wall Street. In the wake of the 2007-08 financial crisis, trillions of dollars were pumped into the system to buy up the worthless assets of the trans-Atlantic zombie financial houses. That bailout program has continued over the last 15 years and was then accelerated by using the outbreak of COVID-19 as a pretext. As reported recently on the Wall Street on Parade blog by Pam and Russ Martens, on December 30th, the Federal Reserve finally released a report on what happened in that fourth quarter of 2019 for the COVID related bailout: $4.5 trillion went that quarter to 24 banks through Repo Loans, with the bulk of it to JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Citigroup.
As they printed trillions of dollars to bail out their worthless system, the physical economy, which is the ultimate basis for paying any sort of debt, was disintegrating at an accelerating rate as infrastructure crumbled and agro-industrial production in the trans-Atlantic nations collapsed. LaRouche referred to this dynamic process as his “triple curve,” where financial aggregates exceed monetary aggregates at a hyperbolic rate, while simultaneously the physical economy collapses also at a hyperbolic rate—ultimately imploding on itself (see triple curve box). It must be stated at this point that the financial system designed by the City of London and Wall Street, with their takedown of the Bretton Woods system in 1971, was never designed to support the present levels of population. That system was designed for the sole purpose of taking down the American System—designed by Alexander Hamilton, and pursued by Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy and emphatically Lyndon LaRouche—while at the same time preventing the rise of that American System internationally, through strategic and financial warfare. To maintain their system, the City of London and their lackeys in Wall Street now need to cull the herd through green policies and hyperinflate away their debt— what they now call “shifting the trillions” of worthless debt into a new carbon-based financial bubble.

A crucial part of “shifting the trillions” is the control of currency. At the August 2019 Jackson Hole meeting, then Governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney proposed that a “global digital synthetic currency controlled by central banks” would eventually be required to replace the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Carney intends to use digital currency to create and control inflation, with the added benefit of obscuring the digital printing presses of the central banks. Carney went on to reference FaceBook’s Libra in this context, which along with Bitcoin and other digital currencies, is being used as a predictive programming device to prepare the way for eventual total control of digital currencies by the central banks.
But there is another agenda behind this digital currency operation—getting rid of commercial banks. At about the time of Carney’s speech, the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank published a paper on central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) which proposed “giving consumers the possibility of holding a bank account with the central bank directly.” This research paper first revealed the potential that such a central-bank currency issued to businesses and households would very likely cause the disappearance of all commercial banks over time, as the central bank became “a deposit monopolist.” And, “The central bank instead will need to rely on investment banks and their expertise to invest in projects by providing them [the investment banks] with non-callable wholesale loans.” So, the result the study found is an economic world of central banks and investment firms only, no commercial banks.
But why would the elimination of commercial banks be essential for a dictatorship run by the central banks relying on the “expertise” of investment banks? Part of that answer lies in the reason why Alexander Hamilton created the commercial banking system, which had previously not existed. Under Hamilton’s design, private commercial banks would play a role in a harmony of interests with a public national bank, but would also provide a check and balance, to ensure that credit was extended to improve the “general welfare” of the population. In the context of London’s green diktat, private commercial banks that would have any independence to deviate from green investments; investment into carbon-based or nuclear technologies would simply not exist.
Mark Carney made that clear at the 2019 UN Secretary General’s Climate Action Summit 2019, when he issued a warning to those in the financial world who did not want to go along with the green agenda:

“Firms that align their business models to the transition to a net zero world [no carbon fuels or chemicals] will be rewarded handsomely. Those that fail to adapt will cease to exist.”

To enforce that “net zero world,” they would need to create new metrics for an economy that would no longer be based on growth of the physical economy, but would now be based on collapsing human population globally under the green diktat. This behavior modification program is called the “Great Reset.”

Imposing The Metrics For An Economy Of Death And Population Control—The Great Reset

The desire to create a better future for oneself and for one’s nation is the problem for the British Empire.
Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, admits this in his Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy that Works for Progress, People and Planet:

[O]ne need only go somewhere like Ethiopia and speak to stakeholders in the country’s economy and government. It reveals the central conundrum of the combat against climate change. The same force that helps people escape from poverty and lead a decent life is the one that is destroying the livability of our planet for future generations. The emissions that lead to climate change are not just the result of a selfish generation of industrialists or western baby boomers. They are the consequence of the desire to create a better future for oneself.

Schwab pretends to be concerned about the environment, but his true fear is the spirit of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the new paradigm of development, of relations between former colonies and former colonizers, that it offers.

Great infrastructure projects, exemplified by Ethiopia’s Renaissance Dam and the expansion of that nation’s rail system, exemplify the global shift towards a policy of peace through development and win-win cooperation that threatens the “rules-based order” of the British Empire. And the bright future of the more than 800 million people lifted out of poverty in China, fundamentally threatens the British green “final solution.”
Schwab’s statement above is from his book that preceded the gathering of the 2021 World Economic Forum’s (WEF) meeting in Davos titled the “Great Reset,” where Schwab, a close ally of Prince Charles, announced the new regulations and metrics for an economy based on the value of mass death in their new world order. These regulations were based on their view of “environment, sustainability, and governance” (ESG). In what Schwab pledged as “a mobilization” to “rebuilding” and “re-setting” our world, that he announced in his January 18, 2021 press conference for his book and the WEF great reset agenda, he stated:

“During the consultation process on the metrics, more than two-thirds of the 140 International Business Council members—including many of the largest companies in the world—supported them too. And all major accounting firms, the so-called Big Four (Deloitte, EY, KPMG, and PwC) even helped develop the metrics. They are committed to helping the metrics become a global standard. In this way, the Stakeholder Capitalism metrics are a major step in turning the idea of stakeholder capitalism into a practical reality… A widespread adoption of these Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics is realistic and could happen as soon as 2022.”

These metrics are based on the ESG concept. However, what Schwab was proposing for the “great reset,” Prince Charles had set into motion 15 years earlier. Since 2004, Charles and his henchmen have drawn up and attempted to enforce with increasing intensity, a body of green “accounting-integrated reporting rules,” upon industrial and energy corporations, farms, etc. This is called “taxonomy” in “green finance” circles. Charles has created, or modified existing regulatory bodies, endowing them with the authority to impose harsh penalties upon corporations that do not comply with anti-greenhouse gas accounting rules—which could place non abiding corporations into bankruptcy. In 2004, Charles and HSBC Bank (the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation), one of the world’s leading drug money laundering banks, founded Accounting for Sustainability, or A4S. That development was then followed by the creation of the “Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, which includes 34 central banks and large private banks and funds, headed by Carney and Sir Michael Bloomberg. [see Richard Freeman’s article, “In the Footsteps of George III: Prince Charles Invented and Runs the ‘Green New Deal,’” for a fuller elaboration of Charles’s role in this scheme.]
But again, without the participation of governments and their enforcement powers, these “net-zero carbon” metrics are meaningless, just as the Economist and the <i>Financial Times</i> lamented over the GFANZ program of Carney and <i>Bloomberg</i>. To override the sovereignty of nations, the genocidist forces of the WEF have partnered with the United Nations since 2019 in a fraudulent “public-private partnership” for the mission of carbon neutrality.
This formal 2019 agreement is called the United Nations-World Economic Forum Strategic Partnership Framework for the 2030 Agenda, posted by the WEF. To cite merely one paragraph of it:

“Climate Change: The UN-Forum partnership will focus on achieving clear, measurable and public commitments from the private sector to reach carbon neutrality by 2050.... Collaboration will seek to ... accelerate commitments and platforms for public private cooperation in critical high-emitting sectors such as transportation, including land-based transport, shipping, and air travel, and heavy industry, particularly steel, cement, oil and gas and aluminum in order to advance the economic transformations necessary to limit global temperature rise to no more than 1.5°C.”

This refers to the WEF announcement at its summit in 2020, of the intention to use “carbon pricing” and carbon taxes to cut down the economic activity of the industries named above. In fact, the “Partnership” document says: “The UN-Forum partnership will focus on aligning financial systems and accelerating finance flows toward the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals.”
However, to “shift the trillion” into a massive green genocide, those governments who object must be eliminated.

Geopolitical Design Of The Green Agenda

As was stated by Lyndon LaRouche in his January 18, 2012 webcast after the summary execution of Libya’s Muammar Qaddafi, referenced earlier in the introduction to this report, the present threat of thermonuclear warfare is fundamentally related to the drive to impose the green diktat, and the fact that many nations of the world will not submit to a massive depopulation agenda—which is exactly what the green policy is when stripped of its fraudulent arguments. “Why should Britain and the United States, and other nations, wish to launch thermonuclear war, against two great thermonuclear powers, Russia and China?”
LaRouche answered in December 2011:

Most of this bailout debt, the Wall Street debt, the London debt … is absolutely worthless. It can never be repaid. And the only solution for this thing was to have this war. And if the British Empire came out as the victor in such a war, with the support of the United States, then they would cancel their debts, and they would go about their business. But the population of the world would be reduced, greatly, through hunger, disease.…

LaRouche’s prophetic warning from (exactly today as of this writing!) a decade ago is essential to understanding the present strategic crisis. The nations of China, Russia and India played a crucial role in the collapse of COP26, and their rejection of the green agenda paved the way for the many other nations who also expressed their objections in Glasgow. But those leading nations, especially China and Russia, have not just rejected London’s depopulation agenda, they have also organized an alternative to the British system—namely, that of the Belt and Road Initiative, which was catalyzed by decades through the work of Lyndon LaRouche and his wife Helga Zepp-LaRouche.
Population control, and its present requirement for the systematic murder of billions through green genocide, has always been at the center of strategic policy for the British Empire, and is contained in the writings of the British operatives like the Church of England’s Thomas Malthus or the later elaborations in the “Open Conspiracy” of HG Wells. Sir Henry Kissinger, who famously said that he kept the British Foreign office better informed than the US State Department, authored the NSSM 200 policy, which explicitly identified population control as a core strategic interest of what he represented—the British Empire. It is possible that had Kissinger’s population control agenda succeeded, or were there success for the IMF’s 1990’s “shock therapy” program depopulation agenda of Russia, or had China’s revolution initiated by Deng Xiaoping and continued through today’s BRI not been launched, there would have been no need for the climate hysteria being used as the basis for the great green reset, since they would have achieved their desired agenda of population control.
Attempts to contain those nations through the strategic objectives of the Project for a New American Century, or the later “Pivot to Asia” and strategic provocations in Ukraine and Syria, are now at the center of international strategic tensions—as well as the financial warfare provocations. The threats of further sanctions, or the “nuclear option” of expelling Russia from SWIFT, would likely have no impact on those nations since they have already worked out alternatives to SWIFT, but may end up collapsing the transAtlantic system— which perhaps could be part of a British directed strategic chaos operation. Either way, the British Empire is now doomed. The only solution is to immediately implement LaRouche’s “Four Laws” and have the United States join with China, Russia and India—the nations LaRouche identified as the “Four Powers.” Helga Zepp-LaRouche has been organizing to deal with the massive humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan, as well as cooperating on the pandemic by building health systems for all nations, as the basis for cooperation among the Four Powers. Join with The LaRouche Organization in this mission—Britain Delenda Est.